I feel even more responsive to her earlier work, now that I
understand where she was coming from. In
a much similar sense, I myself have felt alone and isolated in the new town I
find myself in for school. It is intriguing how she took that depressed feeling
of solidarity and paired it with her fear of New York City, and created these
different views of herself, to help cope and escape from it all. I have always
assumed she was just a fan of movie stills.
I like how she references the first time she thinks about
the “male gaze,” and deliberately flips it around to show the males that are
gazing that it is perverse and perverted.
She draws inspiration from the media surrounding her, and as she put it,
it was probably because she was part of the first generation to have a
television to view all the time.
I am not particularly a fan of the work after Robert Lango
is interviewed and speaks of the “paining” period in the 80s, where men’s
artworks were being bought up and primarily paintings. So she started creating
work that was “un-buyable.” I would have
to agree with that statement. The images
in her previous work, with herself as the main model, did exactly what she
anticipated in my opinion; it made you create your own story line of the
individual. When she starts
desensitizing her work with plastic models, in my opinion it loses all
semblance of having a real purpose. I think it is primarily created to shock
and awe. Especially when “plastic pornography” is the subject that turns erotic
and is directed at the NEA’s censorship on artists. It does just that; I am just not sure if I am a
fan.
Jamie Lee Curtis is quoted saying that Cindy Sherman’s work
is “Haunting, Scary, Perfect, she created a whole story with one film still.”
No comments:
Post a Comment